Interarm Systolic Blood Pressure Difference Research Articles

Association of interarm blood pressure difference with selected body circumferences among Walter Sisulu University community

BackgroundA high interarm blood pressure difference (IAD) has been identified as a precursor of vascular diseases. Anthropometric measures for obesity such as body circumferences including waist circumference (WC), mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) and neck circumference (NC) have been associated with a high IAD in Western countries. However, the prevalence of IAD and its association with body circumferences in South African communities such as universities is not well established. Therefore, this study aimed at investigating the correlation of IAD with selected body circumferences among the Walter Sisulu University (WSU) community.MethodsA total of 230 participants, 117 males and 113 females, consisting of 185 students and 45 staff members from WSU, aged 18–27 and 18–63 years respectively, participated in this cross-sectional study. The selected body circumferences: WC, MUAC, and NC were measured using standard procedures. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured in both arms simultaneously using automated machines. IAD was achieved by calculating differences in SBP and DBP between the left (L) and right (R) arms, (R -L), and getting the absolute value, L–R (|L–R|).Results14.78% of the participants had an interarm SBP difference (IASBPD) ≥ 10 mmHg, and 4.35% of participants had an interarm DBP difference (IADBPD) ≥ 10 mmHg.In a Pearson’s correlation analysis, IASBPD was positively correlated with the selected body circumferences (WC, r = 0.29; P < 0.001; MUAC, r = 0.35; P < 0.001; NC, r = 0.27; P < 0.001) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) (r = 0.30; P < 0.001). In the multivariable-adjusted regression analyses, IASBPD was positively associated with MUAC (adjusted R2 = 0.128, β = 0.271 (95% CI = 0.09; 0.60), P = 0.008), and NC (adjusted R2 = 0.119, β = 0.190 (95% CI = 0.01; 0.32), P = 0.032) only, adjusted for MAP, age, gender, body mass index, smoking, and alcohol. There was no association of body circumferences with IADBPD.ConclusionA high IAD is common among students and staff members of the WSU community. Furthermore, IAD showed a positive correlation with MUAC and NC. These body circumferences can serve as indicators of high IAD, aiding in the early detection and prevention of vascular diseases.

Association between Interarm Systolic Blood Pressure Difference and Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Angiography

Association between Interarm Systolic Blood Pressure Difference and Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Angiography

Prevalence and factors associated with inter-arm systolic and diastolic blood pressure differences: results from the baseline Fasa Adult’s Cohort Study (FACS)

BackgroundOne of the modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular diseases is the inter-arm blood pressure difference (IAD), which can be easily measured. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and factors related to the Iranian population’s inter-arm differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressure.MethodThis cross-sectional study was conducted on the baseline data of participants who had Iranian nationality, were at least 1 year of residence in the area, aged within the age range of 35–70 years, and willed to participate from the Fasa Persian Adult Cohort Study (FACS). IAD for systolic and diastolic blood pressure was measured and categorized into two groups of difference < 10 and ≥ 10 mmHg. Logistic regression was used to model the association between independent variables and IAD.ResultsThe prevalence of systolic and diastolic IAD ≥ 10 mmHg was 16.34% and 10.2%, respectively, among 10,124 participants. According to the multivariable logistic regression models, age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.019 [95% CI: 1.013, 1.025]), body mass index (BMI) (aOR: 1.112 [95% CI: 1.016, 1.229]), having type 2 diabetes (aOR Yes/No: 1.172 [95% CI: 1.015, 1.368]), having chronic headaches (aOR Yes/No: 1.182 [95% CI: 1.024, 1.365]), and pulse rate (aOR: 1.019 [95% CI: 1.014, 1.024]) significantly increased the odds of systolic IAD ≥ 10 mmHg. Additionally, high socio-economic status decreased the odds of systolic IAD ≥ 10 mmHg (aOR High/Low: 0.854 [95% CI: 0.744, 0.979]). For diastolic IAD, age (aOR: 1.112 [95% CI: 1.015, 1.210]) and pulse rate (aOR: 1.021 [95% CI: 1.015, 1.027]) significantly increased the odds of diastolic IAD ≥ 10 mmHg. Moreover, high socioeconomic status decreased the odds of diastolic IAD ≥ 10 mmHg (aOR High/Low: 0.820 [95% CI: 0.698, 0.963]).ConclusionThe noticeable prevalence of systolic and diastolic IAD in general population exhibits health implications due to its’ association with the risk of cardiovascular events. Sociodemographic and medical history assessments have potentials to be incorporated in IAD risk stratification and preventing programs.

Contributing Factors for the Increased Inter-arm Systolic Blood Pressure Difference in Different Age Groups

Abstract OBJECTIVE To explore the contributing factors for the increased inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference (IASBPD) in young, middle-aged, and elderly people. METHODS A total of 51,428 workers in Kailuan who underwent arteriosclerosis detection of extremities during physical examination from 2010 to 2020 were selected as the subjects. The subjects were divided into 3 groups according to the age segment proposed by the World Health Organization: young, middle-aged, and elderly group. Each age group was subsequently divided into 2 groups according to whether the IASBPD was increased: IASBPD 15 mm Hg and IASBPD &amp;gt;15 mm Hg group. The detection rate of IASBPD &amp;gt;15 mm Hg in each age group was calculated, and the contributing factors of IASBPD &amp;gt;15 mm Hg in different age groups were analyzed via multifactor logistic regression model. RESULTS The detection rate of IASBPD &amp;gt;15 mm Hg was 15.65% in all the subjects, and it was 12.90%, 15.28%, and 20.69% in the young, middle-aged, and elderly groups, respectively (χ2 = 343.83, P &amp;lt; 0.01). In all the young, middle-aged, and elderly groups, the risk factors for IASBPD &amp;gt;15 mm Hg included decreased ankle–brachial index (ABI), elevated body mass index (overweight and obesity), male, elevated brachial–ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), and hypertension. Furthermore, elevated high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was a risk factor for increased IASBPD in young people (odds ratio [OR] = l.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00–1.04). And elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was a risk factor (OR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.03–1.15) for increased IASBPD in middle-aged people, and the high level of education was a protective factor (OR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.79–0.94). Diabetes (OR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.16–1.42) and old age (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 1.01–1.02) were risk factors for increased IASBPD in the elderly people, and high level of education (OR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.74–0.95) and elevated high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.72–0.93) were protective factors. CONCLUSIONS The detection rate of IASBPD &amp;gt;15 mm Hg increases with the increase of age in the young, middle-aged, and elderly groups. Decreased ABI, elevated overweight obesity, male, elevated baPWV, and hypertension are common risk factors for increases IASBPD in 3 age groups. Furthermore, elevated hsCRP, elevated LDL-C, diabetes mellitus, and old age are risk factors for increased IASBPD in young, middle-aged, and elderly group, respectively.

Interarm Blood Pressure Difference in Young Healthy Adults.

Inter-arm difference in blood pressure is the difference in the systolic and the diastolic blood pressure between arms of an individual. According to American heart association, interarm Blood Pressure difference of more than 10 mm of Hg are associated with peripheral vascular disease. The present study aims to determine the magnitude of interarm difference in young healthy individuals and to assess whether family history of hypertension, age, sex and Body mass index is related to higher interarm difference Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out among 270 students of Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal. Blood pressure was measured in both the arms using a mercury sphygmomanometer. (Elko 300) Statistical analysis was done using paired t test, chi-square and Pearson's correlation test using SPSS 23. The absolute mean Inter-arm difference for systolic blood pressure was 11.03±0.67mm Hg and for diastolic blood pressure was 6.020 ±0.21 mm Hg. There is significant inter-arm difference for systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure (p<0.001). Inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference was significantly associated with family history of hypertension, age and Body Mass Index (p<0.001) Meanwhile, there was no statistically significant association of sex, family history of hypertension, age and Body Mass Index with inter-arm difference for diastolic blood pressure. Significant inter-arm systolic and diastolic blood pressure differences was found in the young, healthy population. Positive correlation of increased Inter-arm difference in Blood Pressure with family history of hypertension was confirmed. This emphasizes the importance of measuring blood pressure in both arms to be a routine practice as we aim for early diagnosis and prompt treatment of hypertensive disorders.

Association of an inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: A meta-analysis of cohort studies.

This meta-analysis evaluated the potential association of a simultaneously measured inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference (IASBPD) and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. The Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed databases were searched through to April 14, 2023 for relevant literature. The outcomes were the associations of IASBPD with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Finally, 10 cohort studies that included 15320 individuals were included. An IASBPD of ≥15mm Hg was associated with increased all-cause mortality (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.61) but an IASBPD of ≥10mm Hg was not (pooled HR 1.28, 95% CI 0.89-1.85). The pooled HR for cardiovascular mortality was 1.88 (95% CI 1.31-2.71) for an IASBPD of ≥10mm Hg and 1.93 (95% CI 1.24-2.99) for an IASBPD of ≥15mm Hg. Subgroup analysis showed that younger patients (HR 9.03, 95% CI 2.00-40.82, p=.004) with an IASBPD ≥15mm Hg were at higher risk of cardiovascular mortality than older patients (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.06-2.64, p=.03); the difference between groups was statistically significant (p=.04). In conclusions, our findings show that a simultaneously measured IASBPD ≥15mm Hg predicts increased all-cause mortality and an IASBPD of ≥15mm Hg or ≥10mm Hg predicts increased cardiovascular mortality. An IASBPD ≥15mm Hg appears to be more correlated with cardiovascular mortality in younger patients than in older patients.

Systolic inter-arm blood pressure difference and estimated glomerular filtration rate in type 2 diabetic patients in Palestine: a cross-sectional study

Objectives This study aimed to investigate the association between systolic inter-arm blood pressure difference (IABPD) and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), as well as chronic kidney disease (CKD), in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Patients and methods This cross-sectional study included 189 Palestinians diagnosed with T2DM. Data were collected through personal interviews, medical records and three separate blood pressure measurements from both arms. Patients were stratified in two ways: based on systolic IABPD ≥15 mmHg and the presence of CKD, indicated by an eGFR of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 over a three months period. We used simple and multiple linear regression analyses to clarify the association between systolic IABPD (mmHg) and eGFR and to identify independent predictors for eGFR. Results The mean age was 61.3 years, with a female percentage of 57.7%. The prevalence of systolic IABPD ≥15 mmHg and CKD was 27.5% and 30.2%, respectively. Among patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, the median systolic IABPD was 12.5 mmHg (interquartile range (IQR), 13.5 mmHg), whereas in patients with eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2, it was 7.5 mmHg (IQR, 9.8 mmHg) with a significant difference (p = .021). The results of the multiple linear regression model did not reveal an independent association between systolic IABPD and eGFR, with an unstandardized coefficient (B) of −0.257 (95% confidence interval (CI), −0.623 to 0.109; p = .167). However, older age (B, −0.886; 95% CI, −1.281 to −0.49; p < .001), hypertension (B, −12.715; 95% CI, −22.553 to −2.878; p = .012) and a longer duration of DM (B, −0.642; 95% CI, −1.10 to −0.174; p = .007) were significantly and negatively associated with eGFR. Conclusions Systolic IABPD did not exhibit an independent association with eGFR in T2DM patients. However, older age, a previous history of hypertension, and a longer duration of DM were all significantly associated with lower eGFR.

Association between inter-arm blood pressure difference and cardiovascular disease: result from baseline Fasa Adults Cohort Study

The inter-arm blood pressure difference has been advocated to be associated with cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Our study aimed to investigate the association between Inter-arm systolic and diastolic blood pressure differences and Cardio Vascular Disease (CVD). A total of 10,126 participants aged 35–70 years old were enrolled in a prospective Fasa Persian Adult Cohort. In this cross-sectional study, the cutoff values for inter-arm blood pressure difference were less than 5, greater than 5, greater than 10, and greater than 15 mm Hg. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to analyze the data. Based on the results the prevalence of ≥ 15 mmHg inter-arm systolic and diastole blood pressure difference (inter-arm SBPD and inter-arm DBPD) were 8.08% and 2.61%. The results of logistic regression analysis showed that inter-arm SBPD ≥ 15 and (OR<5/≥15 = 1.412; 95%CI = 1.099–1.814) and inter-arm DBPD ≥ 10 (OR<5/≥10 = 1.518; 95%CI = 1.238–1.862) affected the risk of CVD. The results showed that the differences in BP between the arms had a strong positive relationship with CVD. Therefore, inter-arm blood pressure could be considered a marker for the prevention and diagnosis of CVD for physicians.

ABNORMAL INTER-ARM SYATOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE DIFFERENCE IN ADULTS WITH CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE

Objective: Many papers have been reported that hypertension and cardiovascular disease are high frequency in adults with congenital heart disease. It is well known that significant inter-arm blood pressure difference can predict cardiovascular risk. We investigate the inter-arm blood pressure difference in adults with congenital heart disease. Design and method: We enrolled 100 consecutive subjects aged 20 years or more, who visited the Department of Adult Congenital Heart Disease, Chiba Cardiovascular Center. The exclusion criteria were history of arrhythmia, which makes accurate pulse wave analysis impossible and history of cardiac operation within 6 months. The patients were classified into 3 groups. The patients in group A had undergone surgery, which sacrifice subclavian arteries (subclavian flap method and original Blalock-Taussig shunt). The patients in group B had undergone surgery to their subclavian arteries, which conserve their subclavian arteries (modified Blalock- Taussig shunt). The patients in group C had not undergone surgery to their subclavian arteries. The bilateral brachial blood pressures were simultaneously measured using form PWV/ABI (Colin, Komaki, Japan). The inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference greater than 10mmHg was defined as significant inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference. Results: Patients’ age was 36.6±14.9 years. Mean difference between bilateral brachial systolic blood pressures was 8.2±13.6 mmHg. Twenty-one patients demonstrated the inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference (29%). Nine patients were classified as group A and all patients in group A demonstrated inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference (29.1±35.6mmHg). Sixteen patients were classified as group B and 9 patients had undergone modified Blalock-Taussig shunt bilaterally. Four patients (44%) in group B demonstrated inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference (bilateral; 3, unilateral: 1). In 75 group C patients, 8 patients (11%) demonstrated inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference. There was no difference between group C patients in with and without the inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference in body mass index, hemoglobin A1 level, lipid profile. Conclusions: The significant inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference in adults with congenital heart disease is not uncommon. The intervention can strongly influence on their inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference.

The predictive value of interarm systolic blood pressure differences in patients with vascular disease: Sub-analysis of the COMPASS trial

Background and aimsSystolic blood pressure interarm difference (IAD) predicts cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in primary prevention populations. We examined the predictive value of IAD and the effects of treatment with the combination of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg once daily versus aspirin 100 mg once daily according to IAD in patients with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease. MethodsCOMPASS trial patients with IAD <15 mmHg and IAD >15 mmHg were compared with respect to thirty-month incidence risk of: 1) composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular death (MACE), 2) composite of acute limb-ischemia or vascular amputation (MALE), 3) composite of MACE or MALE, and 4) effects of treatment with the combination versus aspirin alone on these outcomes. Results24,539 patients had IAD<15 mmHg and 2,776 had IAD ≥15 mmHg. Relative to patients with IAD ≥15 mm Hg, those with IAD<15 mmHg had similar incidence rates for all measured outcomes including the composite of MACE or MALE (HR 1.12 [95% CI: 0.95 to 1.31], p = 0.19), with the exception of stroke (HR 1.38 [95% CI: 1.02 to 1.88], p = 0.04). Compared to aspirin alone, the combination consistently reduced the composite of MACE or MALE in both IAD <15 mmHg (HR 0.74 [95% CI: 0.65–0.85], p < 0.0001, ARR = −23.1) and IAD>15 mmHg (HR 0.65 [95% CI: 0.44–0.96], p = 0.03; ARR = −32.6, p interaction = 0.53) groups. ConclusionsUnlike primary prevention populations, measuring IAD for risk stratification purposes does not appear to be useful in patients with established vascular disease.

The Predictive Value of Inter Arm Blood Pressure Difference, Inter Leg Blood Pressure Difference and Ankle Brachial Index for Acute Aortic Dissection

Introduction: Abnormal inter arm systolic blood pressure, inter leg systolic blood pressure and ankle brachial index (ABI) are related to vascular diseases. Our aim was to evaluate the correlation of inter arm systolic blood pressure difference (IASBPD), inter leg systolic blood pressure difference (ILSBPD), and ABI with acute aortic dissection (AAD) and their role in predicting AAD. Methods: In this prospective case-control study, 180 patients with AAD admitted to the emergency department were prospectively and consecutively collected in Tongji Hospital from October 2019 to December 2020. 180 healthy people matched by sex, age and BMI served as control group. All participants were adults over 18 years of age who underwent four-limb blood pressure measurements. IASBPD, ILSBPD and ABI were compared between the two groups and their associations with AAD were analyzed. Results: A total of 360 patients (180 cases and 180 controls) were analyzed. In case group IASBPD was larger [(15.23 ± 16.15) mm Hg vs. (4.19 ± 3.63) mm Hg] and ILSBPD was larger (13.00 mm Hg vs. 5.70 mm Hg). ABI was smaller [(0.98 ± 0.24) vs. (1.12 ± 0.09)], and the difference was statistically significant (all p &lt; 0.05). According to the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), IASBPD ≥10 mm Hg (Sen 61.7%, Spe 88.9%), ILSBPD ≥13 mm Hg (Sen 50.6%, Spe 80.6%) and ABI ≤0.9 (Sen 53.3%, Spe 87.2%), showed significant correlation with AAD (all p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: Compared with healthy people, IASBPD and ILSBPD levels were higher and ABI levels were lower in patients with AAD. IASBPD ≥10 mm Hg and ILSBPD ≥13 mm Hg can be used as indicators for early screening of AAD, and IASBPD ≥10 mm Hg has better predictive value for the occurrence of AAD. In patients with typical chest pain, attention needs to be paid to measuring blood pressure in the extremities.

PS-C04-5: ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN INTERARM SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE DIFFERENCE AND HYPERTENSIVE ORGAN DAMAGES IN PATIENTS WITH ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION

Objective: Several studies and meta-analyses have reported that interarm systolic blood pressure difference (IAD) in the upper limbs is associated with risks such as all-cause mortality and cardiovascular diseases. However, few results have examined the usefulness of IAD as an index of arteriosclerosis in patients with essential hypertension (EHT). We investigated the relationship between IAD and vascular structures and evaluated the usefulness of IAD as an index of hypertensive organ damages in EHT patients. Design and method: In 71 untreated EHT patients (48 males, average age 56 ± 13 years) without chronic kidney disease (urinary albumin excretion less than 300 mg / g of creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate 60 mL / min / 1.73m2 or more), blood sampling, 24-hour urine collection, and 24-hour blood pressure monitoring were performed. Next, as cardiovascular structural indices, Next, as indicators of vascular structure, the intima media thickness of carotid artery (IMT) was measured by ultrasonography, and the cardio ankle vascular index (CAVI) and ankle brachial index (ABI) were measured by using the Vascular Screening System VaSera VS-1000 (Fukuda Denshi, Tokyo, Japan) device. The absolute value of the difference between the left and right blood pressure measured at the same time was defined as IAD. Results: IAD was not associated with age, BMI, or systolic and diastolic blood pressure in 24-hour blood pressure monitoring. IAD increased accompanying with a decrease in creatinine clearance (r = -0.25, p &lt; 0.05). IAD correlated positively with IMT (r = 0.24, p &lt; 0.05) and negatively with ABI (r = -0.45, p &lt; 0.01), whereas it did not associate with CAVI. Furthermore, in multiple regression analysis using any of IMT, ABI and creatinine clearance as objective variables, and conventional risk factors for atherosclerosis and IAD as explanatory variables, IAD became an independent determinant factor for IMT, ABI and creatinine clearance. Conclusions: In EHT patients, IAD was associated with decreased renal function and vascular abnormalities. IAD was considered to be a useful index as an initial screening for latent hypertensive organ damages in EHT patients.

PS-C05-9: COMBINED EFFECT OF INTER-ARM SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE DIFFERENCE AND CAROTID ARTERY PLAQUE ON CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS

Objectives: Previous studies have confirmed the relations between inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference (IASBPD) and carotid artery plaque with the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) respectively. But it is unclear whether the combined effect of IASBPD and carotid artery plaque further increases the risk of CVD and all-cause mortality. Methods: We enrolled 4970 participants (≧ 40 years old) in the prospective Kailuan Study. All participants underwent dual-arm blood pressure and carotid artery ultrasounds. IASBPD was the absolute value of the difference between dual-arm blood pressure. All the participants were divided into four groups according to their IASBPD levels and the presence or absence of carotid artery plaque, Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for incident CVD and all-cause mortality. Results: During a median follow-up of 7 years, 179 CVD events and 266 deaths occurred. Multivariable Cox Regression showed that participants with IASBPD ≧ 10mmHg and plaque had a significantly higher incidence of CVD, cerebral infarction (CI) and myocardial infarction (10%, 7.27%, 1.36%, respectively). After adjusting for covariates, the IASBPD ≧ 10mmHg and carotid plaque group significantly increased risks for CVD (HR 2.38; 95% CI, 1.40∼4.05), CI (HR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.31∼4.67), and all-cause mortality (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.20∼3.59). Conclusions: Our study indicated that the combination of IASBPD and carotid artery plaque was associated with incident CVD and all-cause mortality.

PS-C11-11: DEGREE OF BRACHIAL AND CENTRAL ARTERIAL BLOOD PRESSURE IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS WITH INTER-ARM BLOOD PRESSURE DIFFERENCE(IAD)&lt; 10MMHG VERSUS≧ 10MMHG

RuFei Liu, WenLi Cheng(Email:chengwenli2000@163.com) Objective: IAD ≧ 10mmHg has been proven to be a predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, especially in people with hypertension. Compared with brachial blood pressure, central blood pressure was more effective in reflecting hemodynamic changes and had a stronger relationship with target organ damage. No study has analyzed the degree of central blood pressure in hypertensive patients with IAD &lt; 10mmHg versus ≧ 10mmHg. The objective of this study was to analyze differences in central and brachial arterial blood pressure and the proportion of brachial systolic blood pressure ≧ 140mmHg or central systolic blood pressure ≧ 130mmHg in hypertensive patients grouped by IAD. Methods: The study cohort comprised of 2103 eligible individuals. Their BPs were assessed simultaneously in both arms using an Omron BP-203RPEIII vascular profiler, and the IAD was measured as the absolute difference in these values (absolute value of left minus right). The CBP was noninvasively measured using an Omron HEM-9000AI device. Multivariate regression analysis was used to assess the association between the central SBP (cSBP) and the inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference (IASBPD). Results: Applying 130/140 mmHg as cSBP/bSBP thresholds delineated concordant central and brachial normotension (n = 1131;53.8%) and hypertension (n = 702;33.4%) versus isolated brachial hypertension (n = 178;8.5%) and isolated central hypertension (n = 92;4.4%). Women made up close to 70% of the patient with central systolic hypertension but normal bSBP. After adjusting for brachial SBP, brachial DBP, sex, age and BMI, patients with IAD ≧ 10mmHg had a higher risk of cSBP ≧ 130mmHg [OR (95%CI): 1.6 (1.3, 2.1), P &lt; 0.001]. Conclusion: Hypertensive patients with IAD *&amp;ge* 10mmHg had higher cSBP, cDBP and a higher proportion of central systolic blood pressure.

Combined effect of inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference and carotid artery plaque on cardiovascular diseases and mortality: A prospective cohort study

Previous studies have confirmed the relations between inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference (IASBPD) and carotid artery plaque with the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). But it is unclear whether the combined effect of IASBPD and carotid artery plaque further increases the risk of CVD and all-cause mortality. We enrolled 4,970 participants (≥40 years old) in the prospective Kailuan study. All participants underwent dual-arm blood pressure and carotid artery ultrasounds. IASBPD was the absolute value of the difference between dual-arm blood pressure. All the participants were divided into four groups according to their IASBPD levels and the presence or absence of carotid artery plaque and Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for incident CVD and all-cause mortality. During a median follow-up of 7 years, 179 CVD events and 266 deaths occurred. Multivariable Cox Regression showed that participants with IASBPD ≥ 10 mmHg and plaque had a significantly higher incidence of CVD, cerebral infarction (CI), and myocardial infarction (10, 7.27, and 1.36%, respectively). After adjusting for covariates, the IASBPD ≥ 10 mmHg and carotid plaque group significantly increased risks for CVD (HR 2.38; 95% CI, 1.40∼4.05), CI (HR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.31∼4.67), and all-cause mortality (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.20∼3.59). Our study indicated that the combination of IASBPD and carotid artery plaque was associated with incident CVD and all-cause mortality.

Characteristics of four-limb blood pressure and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity in Chinese patients with Takayasu arteritis

Purpose: Takayasu arteritis (TA) is a rare disease, which is frequently misdiagnosed or its diagnosis can be missed. This study aimed to analyse the characteristics of four-limb blood pressure (4LBP) and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) in patients with TA, which could be useful in disease detection. Materials and Methods: We consecutively enrolled 182 patients with TA at Fuwai Hospital between January 2013 and January 2016. Pulse pressure (PP), pulsatile index (PI), inter-arm systolic blood pressure (SBP) difference (IASBPD), inter-leg SBP difference (ILSBPD), ankle–brachial index (ABI), baPWV, and inter-side baPWV difference (ΔbaPWV) were analysed and compared with those of age-, sex-, and SBP-matched participants without cardiovascular diseases. Results: In the TA group, the diastolic blood pressure was lower (67.4 ± 23.7 vs 84.1 ± 15.0 mmHg), PP was larger (69.7 ± 23.6 vs 53.7 ± 10.6 mmHg), PI was higher (1.3 ± 2.1 vs. 0.6 ± 0.1 mmHg), IASBPD was larger (18.2 ± 24.1 vs 4.2 ± 3.3 mmHg), and ILSBPD was larger (10.7 ± 15.0 vs 5.3 ± 4.1 mmHg) than those of the controls (all p < 0.01). Moreover, the proportions of PP >70 mmHg (36.8% vs 4.4%), PI > 1.0 (40.1% vs 2.2%), IASBPD >15 mmHg (34.6% vs. 0%), highest ABI >1.4 (17.6% vs. 0%), ILSBPD >15 mmHg (14.8% vs. 3.3%), lowest ABI < 0.9 (24.7% vs 2.2%), and ΔbaPWV > 185 cm/s (28.6% vs. 1.1%) were significantly greater in the TA group than in the control group (all p < 0.01). Approximately 80.8% of patients with TA (vs. 10.4% of controls) presented with at least one of these seven parameters (p = 0.000). Conclusion: The characteristics of 4LBP and baPWV in most patients with TA were abnormal, which helped us perform non-invasive primary screening and comprehensive evaluation of vascular lesions in such patients.

Arterial stiffness and contralateral differences in blood pressure: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.

A large interarm difference in brachial systolic blood pressure (SBP) (≥10 or ≥15 mmHg) is strongly associated with elevated cardiovascular events and mortality. Evidence demonstrating whether such contralateral differences in SBP occur in ankle blood pressure and its association with arterial stiffness is scarce. The aims of this study were to characterize arm and ankle contralateral SBP differences in a sample of community‐dwelling older adults (5077), and to determine whether this difference is associated with arterial stiffness assessed by pulse wave velocity (PWV) between the heart and ankle (haPWV), femoral artery and ankle (faPWV), and brachial artery and ankle (baPWV) in the right and left sides. Prevalence of interarm SBP differences ≥10 and ≥15 mmHg was 5.1% and .7%, respectively; the corresponding prevalence for interankle SBP was 24.9% and 12.0%. Higher BMI and lower ankle‐brachial index (ABI) were significantly correlated with greater interarm SBP differences. Increased age, higher BMI, lower ABI, and greater contralateral differences in haPWV, faPWV, and baPWV were significantly correlated to greater interankle SBP differences. Interankle SBP difference ≥15 mmHg was significantly associated with contralateral differences of >80 cm/s in haPWV (OR = 1.94 [95% CI = 1.52–2.49]), >165 cm/s in faPWV (OR = 1.64 [95% CI = 1.27–2.12]), and >240 cm/s in baPWV (OR = 2.43 [95% CI = 1.94–3.05]). The associations remained significant after adjustment for age, sex, race, BMI, smoking status, and ABI. Compared with interarm differences, interankle differences in SBP are common in older adults. The magnitude of interankle, but not interarm, differences in SBP is associated with various measures of arterial stiffness.

Inter-arm differences in regional arterial stiffness and geometry lead to inter-arm systolic blood pressure differences: A modelling study

An inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference (ISBPD), if substantial in magnitude (typically defined as ≥10 mmHg), is a potential cardiovascular risk factor in adults, due to its association with cardiovascular events/mortality. A substantial ISBPD occurs in approximately 10% of the adult population, and, although associations with vascular disease and elevated stiffness have been reported, the mechanisms underlying ISBPD remain unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether inter-arm differences in segmental pulse wave velocity, cross-sectional area, or vascular bed compliance/resistance could give rise to substantial differences in brachial pressures between arms; for example, due to differences in pulse wave transmission and reflection. Using an established one-dimensional model of the major systemic arteries, pulse wave velocity (PWV) was uniformly increased or decreased in arteries of 1) the supra-aortic region leading up to the arm, 2) the brachial region, 3) the forearm, and 4) all of these (entire arm pathway); for the left arm, right arm, and both arms. Cross-sectional area and vascular bed compliance and resistance of the arms were similarly varied. Inter-arm differences in segmental PWV and cross-sectional area (but not bilateral changes) led to associated substantial inter-arm SBP differences, which were observed with changes to brachial, forearm and/or entire arm pathways and were related to altered transmission of forward waves and amplitude/timing of reflected waves. Vascular bed compliance and resistance had minimal influence. We conclude that inter-arm differences in arterial stiffness and geometry may contribute to inter-arm systolic blood pressure differences, warranting further investigation.

Inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference: non-persistence and association with incident cardiovascular disease in the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

We investigated inter-arm systolic blood pressure (sIAD) difference, reproducibility, and incident cardiovascular disease (CVD). We hypothesized that higher sIAD values have low prevalence and nonpersistence over years, but that CVD risk is higher starting from the time of first high absolute sIAD. In Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis participants (n = 6725, 53% female, 45-84 years old), Doppler systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurements were made in both arms (10-minute interval) thrice over 9.5 years. Proportional hazards for CVD (coronary heart disease, heart failure, stroke, peripheral arterial disease (PAD)) over 16.4 years were tested according to time-varying absolute inter-arm difference with covariates: (1) age, gender, race, and clinic; (2) model 1 plus height, heart rate, BP, antihypertensives, BMI, smoking status, lipids, lipid lowering medication, and diabetes. High sIAD was not persistent across exams. Maximum absolute sIAD ≥ 15 mmHg was found at least once in 815 persons. Maximum absolute sIAD had a graded relationship with incident stroke or PAD: 6.2% events; model 2 hazard ratio per 10 mmHg 1.34 (95% CI, 1.15-1.56) and this risk was approximately doubled for maximum absolute sIAD ≥ 15 mmHg vs 0-4 mmHg. Total CVD risk (18.4% events) was increased only for maximum absolute sIAD ≥25 mmHg. Associations with incident CVD did not differ for higher SBP in left vs right arm. A higher maximum absolute sIAD at any exam was associated with greater risk for stroke and PAD especially for values ≥ 15 mmHg, and ≥25 mmHg for other CVD. Measuring SBP between arms may help identify individuals at risk for CVD.

Inter-arm blood pressure difference is associated with contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention

ABSTRACT Objective Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a serious complication in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI). An interarm systolic blood pressure difference (IASBD) ≥10 mmHg has been identified as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of the IASBD for the risk of CIN in patients with STEMI who underwent p-PCI. Method We prospectively investigated 2120 consecutive patients who were hospitalized with a diagnosis of STEMI and underwent p-PCI. A relative increase in serum creatinine levels of ≥ 25% or an absolute increase of ≥ 0.5 mg/dL from baseline within 72 h of contrast exposure was defined as CIN. The IASBD was calculated on admission to the emergency department. The risk of CIN was evaluated. Results The incidence of CIN was 6.6% (n = 139). The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the development of CIN. Age (p = .001), baseline creatinine levels (p < .001), DM (p < .001), HT (p < .001) and anemia (p = .001) were higher in patients with CIN. An IASBD ≥10 mmHg was noted in 13 (9.3%) patients in the CIN group and 83 (4.1%) (p = .001) in the non-CIN group (Table 1). According to the multivariate analysis, the IASBD was found to be a predictor of CIN development (OR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.42–3.90, p: 0.001). Conclusion The IASBD on admission can be a potential predictor of CIN development in patients with STEMI who underwent p-PCI.